UK Music carried out a survey of 1,800 British people between
the ages of 14 and 24 and published many of the results two weeks
ago. But Sharkey revealed in an interview with technology law
podcast OUT-LAW Radio that it asked the young people what they
would pay for an unlimited legal downloads service.
The young people revealed in the survey that they enjoyed using
streaming services but still participated in illegal downloading
because they liked to own material. Many illegal downloaders said
they would use a legal service if it was cheap enough.
"We did ask the question, which we've not made public simply
because it is commercial information, as to what young people felt
they would pay on a monthly basis for a service like that," he
said. "I'm not sure I would personally use the word cheap. They
quite clearly place a very high value on music."
Sharkey's hints that users are prepared to pay more than
expected for such a service could provide a boost to an industry
trying to find services attractive enough to entice users away from
illegal downloading.
The emerging popularity of streaming services such as Spotify
has given the industry some hope, but the participants in UK
Music's survey made it clear that they felt streaming services were
useful but no substitute for download services.
Sharkey would not be drawn on the stance of UK Music – which
represents record labels, managers, writers and musicians – on this
week's Government U-turn on disconnecting alleged file sharers. The
Government extended its Digital Britain consultation period this
week to allow time for responses on its plan, which does not
involve court oversight.
Sharkey said that UK Music would be having a board meeting in
September to decide its stance, but did say that something had to
be done.
"Let's say you develop a graduated response that has got 95
steps. So you've now asked somebody 95 times very nicely and very
politely can you please stop doing that and 95 times they've
refused to," he said. "What do you do?"
UK Music has ruled out backing civil court actions against
individuals, saying they are "unproductive".
Please download the flash player to view this document
Browser does not support script.
Disclaimer: We hope you find OUT-LAW’s content useful. It’s prepared by the lawyers at Pinsent Masons. Please remember, though, that it’s intended as general information only. It’s not legal advice. If that’s what you’re seeking, please
contact us. See also: our
full disclaimer