UK Home >  OUT-LAW News >  News Archive >  2009 >  November 2009 >  Preferential lighting rendered ad misleading, rules ASA

Preferential lighting rendered ad misleading, rules ASA

OUT-LAW News, 05/11/2009

An advertiser broke the rules when it used better lighting, posing and colours in the 'before' than the 'after' pictures in a cosmetics ad, regulator the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has said. 

Sanofi-Aventis created the advert for its inject-able facial product Sculptra, which it claimed would make a person look younger.

The advert stated that the photographs "have not been retouched" and the ASA did not say that they had, but they did say that other techniques used to make the model look better in the 'after' picture broke its rules on truthfulness.

The company told the ASA that it "believed the photos were representative and provided additional results and photos showing the effects of Sculptra on patients, along with patient and doctor consent," the ASA said.

The claims for the treatment included that "Sculptra stimulates your natural collagen production to help smooth lines and wrinkles, and restores facial contours, helping you to look younger naturally for up to 2 years after treatment".

The ASA said that the clearly different photography methods used for the 'after' photos were likely to make it difficult for consumers to assess the truthfulness of the claims.

"We noted that the Before and After photos used different lighting and colour casts and that the photos were reproduced at different sizes," said the ASA ruling. "We also noted that the models expression and make up was slightly different in each shot."

"We considered that changing the lighting, light angle, colour or framing could have a significant effect on the appearance of the model," it said. "We acknowledged that the model might be considered to look younger in the After shot, but considered that the differences in the way the photos were produced could misrepresent the effects of the treatment and concluded that the images were misleading."

The ASA said that the advert broke its rules on truthfulness, substantiation and health and beauty products.

See: The ruling

Disclaimer: We hope you find OUT-LAW’s content useful. It’s prepared by the lawyers at Pinsent Masons. Please remember, though, that it’s intended as general information only. It’s not legal advice. If that’s what you’re seeking, please contact us. See also: our full disclaimer

 

OUT-LAW Recommends

This week's podcast
Bribery law extended

Advert: Pinsent Masons works with forensic accountants to help you to manage the costs of litigation. Our approach is called Reaching Solutions.
UK Home | 
2010 | 
2009
2008 | 
2007 | 
2006 | 
2005 | 
2004 | 
2003 | 
2002 | 
2001 | 
2000 | 
Fun | 

 

Pinsent Masons named Legal Firm of the Year 2009 at Finance Directors' Excellence Awards

OUT-LAW star: link to the home page
Disclaimer: This was printed from OUT-LAW.COM, a service of international law firm Pinsent Masons. We hope you find this content useful. However, please note that nothing in this document constitutes specific legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. Any questions, please email info@out-law.com.