UK Home >  OUT-LAW News >  News Archive >  2008 >  July 2008 >  UK-IPO asks if research exemption in patent law is too vague

UK-IPO asks if research exemption in patent law is too vague

OUT-LAW News, 09/07/2009

The UK Intellectual Property Office (UK-IPO) will attempt to clear up uncertainty and doubt about an exception to patent law for researchers, moving to end a lack of clarity about which acts are illegal and which are allowed.

The move follows the very first recommendation of the 2006 Gowers Review of Intellectual Property commissioned by the Treasury.

There is an exemption to the Patents Act for research work, which is designed to ensure that patent law does not get in the way of new discoveries. The UK-IPO, though, has launched a consultation to address what are perceived to be serious uncertainties about the boundaries of that exemption.

The first recommendation of the Gowers review was to "amend section 60(5) of the Patents Act 1977 to clarify the research exemption to facilitate experimentation, innovation and education".

The UK-IPO quoted the Nuffield Council as saying that "the scope of the exemption is unclear" and The Royal Society as saying that Government should clarify the law on research exemptions.

The DTI itself said in a 2004 report that there is "evident uncertainty … about the extent of the patent research exemption, which is widely seen as problematic”, according to the UK-IPO. Many of the reports cited by the UK-IPO also stressed the need for harmonisation of the research exemption laws across Europe.

The consultation will ask participants if the law needs to be clarified, and how it should be done.

It will also ask whether the exemption should be extended to include not just research using a patented invention without permission or fees, but to research which involves the use of a patented invention itself as a research tool. The UK-IPO says that, at the moment, "research tools which are used in, but are not the subject of, an experiment do not fall within the exception".

The consultation is open until 7th November. 

See:

See also:

Disclaimer: We hope you find OUT-LAW’s content useful. It’s prepared by the lawyers at Pinsent Masons. Please remember, though, that it’s intended as general information only. It’s not legal advice. If that’s what you’re seeking, please contact us. See also: our full disclaimer

 

OUT-LAW Recommends

This week's podcast
Bribery law extended

Advert: Pinsent Masons works with forensic accountants to help you to manage the costs of litigation. Our approach is called Reaching Solutions.
UK Home | 
2010 | 
2009 | 
2008
2007 | 
2006 | 
2005 | 
2004 | 
2003 | 
2002 | 
2001 | 
2000 | 
Fun | 

 

Pinsent Masons named Legal Firm of the Year 2009 at Finance Directors' Excellence Awards

OUT-LAW star: link to the home page
Disclaimer: This was printed from OUT-LAW.COM, a service of international law firm Pinsent Masons. We hope you find this content useful. However, please note that nothing in this document constitutes specific legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. Any questions, please email info@out-law.com.