UK Home >  OUT-LAW News >  News Archive >  2003 >  June 2003 >  Google wins search rankings case

Google wins search rankings case

OUT-LAW News, 03/06/2003

A lawsuit that accused Google of manipulating its page ranking system has been thrown out by a US court. It was filed by SearchKing, a web host and search engine, and argued that Google deliberately made changes to its PageRank system to remove SearchKing's web sites from top search rankings.

SearchKing is the Oklahoma City-based company behind a business called the PR Ad Network. "PR" stands for Page Rank, a reference to Google's system of ranking web pages. Google scores every web page that it indexes with a number between 1 and 10.

The higher the score, or PageRank, the more likely the page will appear at the top of a user's search results. Google users can access this PageRank information via a free download from Google.

The PR Ad Network sells advertising on third party web sites. It uses Google's PageRank information to gauge the value of any web site for its advertising clients and charges accordingly, in competition with Google's own advertising sales.

In its lawsuit filed in 2002, SearchKing alleged that Google changed the PageRank system's algorithms for calculating search results, in an attempt to devalue the company's PageRank score.

In November 2002, SearchKing's PageRank was restored, however the company decided to proceed with the lawsuit "as a matter of principle."

Last week the Western District Court of Oklahoma dismissed the case on the grounds that PageRank was an opinion, and therefore protected by the First Amendment.

The court took the view that the rankings created by PageRank were "fundamentally subjective in nature" and, according to court documents, "PageRanks are opinions - opinions of the significance of particular websites as they correspond to a search query".

Bob Massa, SearchKing's CEO, said of the after the ruling was announced, saying,

"This case was never about placement in search results or page rank. This case was about the attempt to restrict the legal business of another without due process. It was about the abuse of power. SearchKing never broke a law, yet was accused, judged and executed without so much as a notice of intent."

See also:

Disclaimer: We hope you find OUT-LAW’s content useful. It’s prepared by the lawyers at Pinsent Masons. Please remember, though, that it’s intended as general information only. It’s not legal advice. If that’s what you’re seeking, please contact us. See also: our full disclaimer

 

OUT-LAW Recommends

This week's podcast
Bribery law extended

Advert: Pinsent Masons works with forensic accountants to help you to manage the costs of litigation. Our approach is called Reaching Solutions.
UK Home | 
2010 | 
2009 | 
2008 | 
2007 | 
2006 | 
2005 | 
2004 | 
2003
2002 | 
2001 | 
2000 | 
Fun | 

 

Pinsent Masons named Legal Firm of the Year 2009 at Finance Directors' Excellence Awards

OUT-LAW star: link to the home page
Disclaimer: This was printed from OUT-LAW.COM, a service of international law firm Pinsent Masons. We hope you find this content useful. However, please note that nothing in this document constitutes specific legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. Any questions, please email info@out-law.com.