Cookies on Pinsent Masons website

This website uses cookies to allow us to see how the site is used. The cookies cannot identify you. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with this

If you want to use the sites without cookies or would like to know more, you can do that here.

Technology firm's plug-in and app patent claims invalid, US court rules

A US technology company that claimed major internet companies owed it hundreds of millions of dollars for infringing its patents rights has had its cases against the companies cancelled after a US court ruled its patents are invalid.10 Feb 2012

Eolas Technologies had sued Google, Yahoo! and a host of other online companies claiming that it was owed royalties from them for their use of technology it owned patent rights for. Eolas registered patents that enable the operation of interactive technologies that are embedded in web pages, but a US court has now ruled that the patents are invalid. Imminent lawsuits that Eolas was due to bring against the companies have been cancelled as a result. The company was seeking more than $600 million in damages from the companies over the claimed infringement, according to a report by technology news website Wired.

In a US federal court ruling in Texas an eight-man jury rejected Eolas' claimed ownership of the technology ruling that the company's patents were invalid, according to a the Wired report. Eolas' opponents, which included the founder of the internet Tim Berners-Lee, had claimed the company's patents were falsely based on existing inventions," according to a report by The Register.

Inventions must primarily be new, take an inventive step that is not obvious and be useful to industry to qualify for patent protection.

The ruling means Eolas cannot assert rights over the use of in-browser applications and plug-ins - common features on most websites. Plug-ins are programmes written by third-party developers that provide extra functionality to a web browser, such as by blocking pop-ups from appearing on screen or allowing users to interact with their email or social media accounts at a glance. In-browser applications include streaming video content embedded in web pages.

Many of the companies Eolas had sued had settled the dispute out of court, including Apple and eBay, whilst the technology firm had previously won $565 million in settling a patent dispute with Microsoft.

 “Yahoo is pleased with the outcome of the case and the jury’s decision, and we thank the jury for their time and commitment to this case. Yahoo respects intellectual property and will continue to protect its freedom to operate by defending itself against meritless claims,” a Yahoo spokesperson said after the ruling, according to the Wired's report.

A spokesman for Google said the company was "pleased" with the jury's decision and that it "affirms our assertion that the claims are without merit," the report said.

Join My Out-Law

  • See only the content that matters to you
  • Tailor Out-Law to your exact needs
  • Save the most useful content for later reading
  • Tailor our weekly eNewsletter to your interests

Join My Out-Law

Already signed up to My Out-Law? Sign in