The Lisbon Treaty: a guide for in-house lawyers
This guide was published on 1st December 2009, the day the
Lisbon Treaty came into effect.
Introduction
Much of the press coverage on the Lisbon Treaty has been
dominated by institutional issues. No concerted effort has been
made at national level to translate the relevance of Lisbon for
mainstream commercial activity. The following brief note therefore
highlights some of the main changes that may affect day-to-day
practice, covering new terminology, renumbering of Articles,
developments in substantive and procedural law and suggestions for
referencing the new Treaty Articles.
Changes in terminology
The following are changes in terminology that will be used by
the EU in the future, post-Lisbon:
- All references to "European Community" or "European
Communities" disappear and are replaced by "European
Union". The European Commission expects us to use "EU Law"
in future, instead of "EC Law".
- The European Communities Treaty (EC Treaty) has been amended
and renamed the "Treaty on the Functioning of the European
Union (TFEU)"
- The term "common market" is now formally replaced by the
"internal market"
- The current European Court of Justice is renamed the
"the Court of Justice"
- The current Court of First Instance is renamed the "the
General Court"
- "The Court of Justice of the European Union"
refers collectively to the Court of Justice, the General Court and
any specialist Judicial Panels created (the only current one being
the EU Civil Service Panel)
A number of these changes will require amendments to UK
Law and provision is made in the European Union (Amendment)
Act 2008 for those changes to be made formally by
statutory instrument.
Renumbering of Treaty Articles
A complete
table of equivalences (28-page / 118KB PDF) showing
Article numbers pre and post Lisbon is available. Some of the most
commonly encountered changes will include:
|
Previous numbering
contained in the EC Treaty
|
New Article number
contained in the TFEU - sometimes with textual changes
|
|
Article 12 (non
discrimination - nationality)
|
Article 18
|
|
Article 28 (free movement of
goods)
|
Article 34
|
|
Article 30 (justifications
for restricting free movement of goods)
|
Article 36
|
|
Article 39 (free movement of
workers)
|
Article 45
|
|
Article 43 (freedom of
establishment)
|
Article 49
|
|
Article 49 (freedom to
provide services)
|
Article 56
|
|
Article 56 (free movement of
capital)
|
Article 63
|
|
Article 81 (competition -
restrictive agreements)
|
Article 101
|
|
Article 82 (competition -
abuse of dominance)
|
Article 102
|
|
Article 86 (public
undertakings/special exclusive rights)
|
Article 106
|
|
Article 87 (state aid)
|
Article 107
|
|
Article 230 (judicial review
of Community acts)
|
Article 263
|
|
Article 234 (preliminary
references to the Court of Justice)
|
Article 267
|
Some of the key substantive and procedural changes of interest
to commercial practice
There has been little change to the substantive law contained in
the European Community Treaty. The following, however, merit a
brief note:
- The Lisbon Treaty provides a more secure legislative
platform for the EU to legislate on areas such as Energy
and Intellectual Property, potentially widening the scope of
existing forms of legislative intervention. Lisbon also offers the
potential for greater legislative involvement in the field of data
protection (Art 16(2) TFEU) and in alternative methods of dispute
resolution (Art 81(2)(g) TFEU).
- Fundamental rights are given an elevated legal status, but
within a narrow straightjacket. The Charter of Fundamental
Rights of the European Union (2000) will have equal legal
status with the TFEU and Treaty on European Union (save for a
number of express derogations, including the fact that the Charter
will not create any new social or employment rights that could
undermine existing UK Law). Furthermore, the Lisbon Treaty states
that the Charter will not extend the competences of the EU.
- The relaxation of locus standi under Art 263
TFEU (ex Art 230 EC) for individuals seeking judicial review of
certain types of regulatory acts made by the European Commission
etc. The removal of the requirement to prove that the regulatory
act was also of "individual concern" to the claimant could widen
the number of challenges made to European Commission
activities.
Referencing Treaty Articles
When the Treaty of Rome was amended significantly in 1999, the
Luxembourg Courts published guidelines on how to refer to the pre
and post reform Treaty Articles. As yet, no similar guide has been
published for Lisbon purposes. The following suggestions are thus
offered on the basis of previous experience.
- To refer to the post-Lisbon factual situation where Lisbon
makes no change to the previous EC Treaty Article, use e.g.
Art 102 TFEU (ex Art 82 EC)
- To refer to a post-Lisbon factual situation where Lisbon has
made a change to the previous EC Treaty Article, use e.g.
Art 107 TFEU
- To refer to a pre-Lisbon factual situation covered by the
Treaty establishing the European Community where Lisbon makes no
change to the previous Treaty Article, use e.g. Article 82
EC ([ex 86;] post Lisbon, Article 102 TFEU). Note: The
reference in square brackets can normally be omitted unless the
relevant set of facts occurred in a short period after 1st May 1999
(when the Treaty of Amsterdam came into effect).
Resources
Contact
Disclaimer: We hope you find OUT-LAW’s content useful. It’s prepared by the lawyers at Pinsent Masons. Please remember, though, that it’s intended as general information only. It’s not legal advice. If that’s what you’re seeking, please
contact us. See also: our
full disclaimer