Napster has thus won a stay of execution from a potential
multi-million dollar bill for unpaid royalties.
Judge Patel voiced criticism towards some of the parties
bringing the case against Napster. She stated that some of the
record companies involved in the lawsuit may attempt to abuse their
positions of dominance with music download services of their own.
She pointed out that one such service, MusicNet did itself exhibit
hallmarks of anti-competitive business practices. The enterprise
“looks bad, sounds bad and smells bad,” she said.
Napster’s lawyers speculate that the fact that the major labels
are working together to form MusicNet and Pressplay may allow them
to set price controls to limit the marketplace. This would mean
that Napster would have little option but to sign deals with them
when it re-launches as a legitimate service.
Napster hopes that this argument may help it to escape
prosecution altogether. However, the music industry has slated such
arguments as amounting to no more than attempt to stall for
time.
