Webtrends Tracking Code
 
UK Home >  OUT-LAW News >  News Archive >  2002 >  March 2002 >  Local loop unbundling too slow, says European Commission

Local loop unbundling too slow, says European Commission

OUT-LAW News, 04/03/2002

The European Commission has criticised the efforts of incumbents such as BT in giving competitors access to the last mile of telephone lines into European homes, known as the unbundling of the local loop, something which is seen as essential to develop competition in the broadband internet market.

The unbundling or access to the local loop on fair terms was required by a Council Regulation of December 2000. The Commission is now calling upon the EU Member States, national competition and regulatory authorities and dominant players to “play their part to ensure that the objectives of unbundling are met.”

In the meantime, the Commission, which has already launched infringement proceedings against some Member States in December, may take action against those companies which abuse their dominant position.

The report concludes that the new entrants seeking to rent copper lines from incumbents to deploy their own services (in particular broadband services) to end-users are confronted with two sets of problems: tariff and cost related problems inherent to the unsatisfactory economic conditions of unbundling throughout Europe; and behavioural problems, reflecting the reluctance of telecom incumbents to open their premises and facilities to their competitors.

Especiallly contentious appear to be the conditions of collocation and the related facilities. Collocation basically consists of the rental of space (each new entrant needs around 10 square meters to install its equipment) in the local exchanges of the incumbent and the right for the staff of new entrants to access the incumbent's buildings. New entrants blame high rental fees, the necessity to build separate rooms to accommodate their equipment and high fees for escorted access to the incumbents' premises.

The combination of expensive collocation conditions and high one-off fees (for activation/ deactivation of unbundled lines) has a clear economic translation and has led a number of operators to turn away from the market or leave aside the residential segment altogether. Many new entrants also allege that they are confronted with price squeezes. The problems reported by new entrants reflect possible infringements of competition law.

See: The Commission’s website provides a report based on the state of unbundling in each Member State

 

OUT-LAW star: link to the home page
Disclaimer: This was printed from OUT-LAW.COM, a service of international law firm Pinsent Masons. We hope you find this content useful. However, please note that nothing in this document constitutes specific legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. Any questions, please email info@out-law.com.