Webtrends Tracking Code
 
UK Home >  OUT-LAW News >  News Archive >  2002 >  July 2002 >  Sex.com appeal in negligence case against VeriSign

Sex.com appeal in negligence case against VeriSign

OUT-LAW News, 17/07/2002

A US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has agreed to revisit a lawsuit which is part of the legal battle between the owner of the domain name sex.com and VeriSign. The court will hear opening arguments in San Francisco on August 13.

The sex.com case is one of the internet’s longest running and most bizarre domain name disputes. For obvious reasons, the domain name is one of the most valuable addresses on the web.

Sex.com was originally registered by Gary Kremen of San Francisco in 1994. The following year, Stephen Cohen, an ex-convict, took the name from Kremen by sending a forged letter of transfer to Network Solutions which later became part of VeriSign. Cohen then ran a highly profitable porn portal until November 2000 when a court awarded Kremen the return of the domain name having found that the forged signature on the letter to Network Solutions misspelled Kremen’s name.

A Californian district court ordered Cohen to pay the sum of $65 million in damages to Kremen. However, Cohen has to date paid nothing. Accordingly, Kremen is instead seeking redress from Network Solutions/VeriSign.

In 2000, a lower court ruled that Network Solutions, which is the sole domain name registry for .com domain names, is immune from civil suit in cases where it negligently handled a domain name. Kremen’s company, Sex.com, which owns the name, then appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Civil liberties group the Electronic Frontier Foundation has filed a brief in the case in support of the action against the registry.

The American Internet Registrants Association (AIRA) said:

“The sex.com case is of great importance to the internet community…The AIRA has been inundated with complaints from registrants who have lost their domain names because of significant and critical VeriSign mistakes… The Ninth Circuit decision will determine whether these aggrieved registrants have any right of redress against VeriSign.”

The appeal was based on claims that Network Solutions did not make even a rudimentary attempt to verify the forged third-party letter presented by Cohen.

One of Kremen’s attorneys said:

“There can be little question that a domain name is inherently a lucrative piece of cyber real estate, generating substantial revenue from its web surfers… Even domain name thieves such as Mr Cohen appreciate that reality.”

After his conviction by the Californian District Court, Cohen has not been seen. It is believed that he lives somewhere in Mexico.

See also:

 

OUT-LAW star: link to the home page
Disclaimer: This was printed from OUT-LAW.COM, a service of international law firm Pinsent Masons. We hope you find this content useful. However, please note that nothing in this document constitutes specific legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. Any questions, please email info@out-law.com.