Webtrends Tracking Code
 
UK Home >  OUT-LAW News >  News Archive >  2002 >  July 2002 >  Reverse engineering rule is unconstitutional, says ACLU

Reverse engineering rule is unconstitutional, says ACLU

OUT-LAW News, 26/07/2002

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) yesterday asked a federal court in Massachusetts to rule that a computer researcher has “fair rights” to examine the full list of sites contained in an internet blocking program and to share his research tools and results with others. The group also claims that the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s (DMCA) restrictions regarding reverse engineering are so broad that they unconstitutionally interfere with researchers’ free speech protections.

The suit was filed on behalf of Ben Edelman, a 22-year-old programmer who is researching internet filtering software. Edelman had testified as an expert witness in a case brought by the ACLU against a federal law that compelled libraries to install filtering software.

In that lawsuit, Edelman reviewed software sold by Seattle company N2H2, used to block web sites for public libraries and state governments. He claimed that such software is “fundamentally unable” to consistently block only pornographic web sites.

The suit also seeks an injunction that would bar N2H2 from suing Edelman under the DMCA. It is also asking the court to declare that the N2H2’s licence agreement for the filtering software is unenforceable, misuses copyright laws and is contrary to federal and state public policy.

This is because it forces licensees to accept a “fine print” contract requiring that they won’t attempt to access the list of blocked sites.

Mr Edelman said: the public has the right to know what is being blocked, and I believe I have the right to uncover this information without being subject to a corporate lawsuit.”

The DMCA provides for broad prohibitions against circumventing copy-protection techniques. Last year, the Library of Congress ruled that there is an exemption which applies to “compilations consisting of lists of web sites blocked by filtering software applications.” However the exemption does not cover researchers who write and distribute software that decodes the encrypted lists.

 

 

OUT-LAW star: link to the home page
Disclaimer: This was printed from OUT-LAW.COM, a service of international law firm Pinsent Masons. We hope you find this content useful. However, please note that nothing in this document constitutes specific legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. Any questions, please email info@out-law.com.