Webtrends Tracking Code
 
UK Home >  OUT-LAW News >  News Archive >  2003 >  June 2003 >  Supreme Court rejects sex.com appeal

Supreme Court rejects sex.com appeal

OUT-LAW News, 16/06/2003

In the latest stage of one of the internet's longest-running domain name disputes, the US Supreme Court last week rejected an appeal over an award of $65 million, due to be paid by a man who effectively stole the lucrative domain name sex.com from its original owner.

Sex.com was originally registered by Gary Kremen of San Francisco in 1994. The following year, Stephen Cohen, an ex-convict, took the name from Kremen by sending a forged letter of transfer to Network Solutions (which subsequently became part of VeriSign).

Cohen then ran a highly profitable porn portal until November 2000 when a court awarded Kremen the return of the domain name, having found that the forged signature on the letter to Network Solutions misspelled Kremen's name.

A Californian district court ordered Cohen to pay the sum of $65 million in damages to Kremen. Cohen has to date paid nothing and failed to appear at several court hearings, but managed to appeal as far as the Supreme Court – albeit without success. Kremen's lawyer James Wagstaffe explains why he thinks Cohen has failed: "mainly because he is a fugitive from justice and has blatantly abused the litigation process."

Pamela Urueta, another of Kremen's lawyers, elaborates:

"The Supreme Court's denial of Mr. Cohen's writ petition is significant because it puts the final nail in the coffin. Cohen has tried unsuccessfully both in the Ninth Circuit and, most recently in the Supreme Court, to overturn the $65 million judgment against him. There is nowhere else for him to try to appeal; the judgment is final."

Cohen is currently believed to be living in Tijuana, Mexico. But the story is not over yet. Perhaps fearing that he'll never see money from Cohen, Kremen is seeking to recover from VeriSign. Another of Kremen's legal team, Charles Carreon, commented on Thursday, " I trust that, eventually, VeriSign will accept responsibility for its initial blunder, and pay Gary the damages that are due."

Kremen still awaits the court's decision in his separate appeal against Network Solutions, now a part of VeriSign. He contends that it negligently transferred the domain name to Stephen Cohen; VeriSign counters that a domain name isn't property and therefore that it is not responsible for the negligent transfer.

 

OUT-LAW Recommends

Free OUT-LAW seminars
- Making your contract work
- Information security
Six cities, October & November

This week's podcast
Are ISPs about to betray our trust?

Winner at 2008 Webby Awards

OUT-LAW star: link to the home page
Disclaimer: This was printed from OUT-LAW.COM, a service of international law firm Pinsent Masons. We hope you find this content useful. However, please note that nothing in this document constitutes specific legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. Any questions, please email info@out-law.com.