Webtrends Tracking Code
 
UK Home >  OUT-LAW News >  News Archive >  2003 >  September 2003 >  Pop-up ad success was down to consent

Pop-up ad success was down to consent

OUT-LAW News, 09/09/2003

On Friday, a US judge explained why he recently awarded victory to WhenU in a dispute over its pop-up adverts. It was all about consent, reasoned Judge Gerald Bruce Lee, handing victory to WhenU and upsetting U-Haul International, which sued over pop-up ads for rival rental firms that appeared on U-Haul's web site if visitors had WhenU's software installed.

Described by U-Haul as a "parasite on the web", WhenU stood accused of trade mark and copyright infringement and unfair competition for its pop-up adware. These ads, headed "Save Now!", will be familiar to any internet user who knowingly – or unwittingly – downloaded the New York-based company's software.

The problem for U-Haul and other aggrieved web site operators is that there are no laws conveniently designed to deal with WhenU's practice, which mirrors the business model of its more famous rival, Gator.

Judge's Lee's verdict was announced in court in July. He has now given his reasons in a written opinion.

WhenU's software exists on 25 million computers, largely as a result of its partnership with KaZaA, the popular file-sharing service. When internet users download KaZaA's software, they also get WhenU's ad-serving software. Its software examines keywords, URLs and search terms in use on the user's browser and then selects which ads to serve the user. Its 400 advertisers include British Airways, JP Morgan Chase, General Motors, Priceline and Verizon.

U-Haul sued WhenU.com in October 2002. It argued that, when those with U-Haul's software installed visited U-Haul's homepage, adverts would appear on screen for rival companies Budget Rent-A-Car, Moversbay.com and Door to Door Storage, without U-Haul's authorisation.

In addition to trade mark and copyright infringement and unfair competition, U-Haul threw in claim of trade mark dilution, contributory copyright infringement, misappropriation, interference with prospective economic advantage, unjust enrichment and a violation of the Virginia Business Conspiracy Act. "It must be stopped," said U-Haul's complaint.

According to BusinessWeek On-line, Judge Lee wrote, "The fact is that the computer user consented to this detour when the user downloaded WhenU's computer software". He added, "While pop-up advertising may crowd out the U-Haul advertisement screen through a separate window, this act is not trademark or copyright infringement, or unfair competition."

This does not make pop-up ads any less annoying, however. According to the judge, "Alas, we computer users must endure pop-up advertising along with her ugly brother 'spam' as a burden of using the internet."

WhenU's CEO, Avi Naider, welcomed the ruling, saying, "This is a victory for consumer choice - it ultimately protects consumers' right to control what they see on their computer screens".

U-Haul has yet to comment.

See also:

 

OUT-LAW Recommends

Data Protection training
We offer training courses on Data Protection and Freedom of Information laws

Winner at 2008 Webby Awards

OUT-LAW star: link to the home page
Disclaimer: This was printed from OUT-LAW.COM, a service of international law firm Pinsent Masons. We hope you find this content useful. However, please note that nothing in this document constitutes specific legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. Any questions, please email info@out-law.com.