Crime (Hong Kong law)
This guide is based on the law of Hong Kong. It was last
updated March 2005. AUK
version is also available.
Overview
The internet is a criminal's playground. The ease with which it
is possible, for example, to set up a spoof site, and do so
anonymously, is cause for concern. Crime involves police, fines and
prison sentences, as well as suing and being sued. Assuming your
business intends to operate entirely above board, you may wonder
what this subject has to do with you. You're not a hacker, you're
not a thief. Possibly, this subject will have nothing to do with
you - if you're fortunate. However, new media and e-commerce
businesses risk becoming the victims of crime and risk being held
criminally responsible for the actions of their employees. While
the law is very much in its infancy in Hong Kong, it is worth being
aware of the risks and of the general principles that apply in this
area of the law.
Crimes Ordinance
Hong Kong does not, as yet, have developed legislation dealing
with computer crimes. Such legislation as there is can be found in
section 161 of the Crimes Ordinance (Cap 200), which provides that
it is an offence to obtain access to a computer:
- With an intent to commit an offence;
- With a dishonest intent to deceive;
- With a view to gain for oneself or another; or
- With a dishonest intent to cause loss to another.
Conviction upon indictment of any of these offences carries a
maximum punishment of five years.
This section was enacted in 1993 before the explosion in the
Internet and e-commerce generally. The section is not therefore
well suited to cover the types of computer launched attacks that we
have seen recently on the world stage.
There is legislation in the pipeline (Criminal Jurisdiction
Ordinance (Amendment of Section 2(2)) Order 2002, which is still
being debated) which will enable Hong Kong courts to exercise
jurisdiction over the offences of
- unauthorised access to a computer;
- criminal damage relating to the misuse of a computer; and
- access to a computer with criminal or dishonest intent
when these crimes are committed or planned outside the
geographical boundaries of Hong Kong.
Viruses
A virus can corrupt data held on a computer or network so as to
render it useless. Where corruption occurs, the person who
developed and/or introduced the virus onto the relevant system
will, depending on the exact circumstances, be guilty of an offence
under the Crimes Ordinance.
Alternatively, a virus could get into your system without your
knowledge, and it could spread to those receiving e-mail
attachments from your system. This could very well result in your
liability for negligence (i.e. civil liability, as opposed to
criminal). In such an action, a court might want to know what
procedures were in place in your business to detect viruses, to
show that you were not negligent. Accordingly, effective virus
detection software could serve your legal interests as well as
those of your system's security.
Software piracy
According to an independent global study in early 2000 reported
by the Business Software Alliance (BSA) and the Software &
Information Industry Alliance (SIIA), of the 615 million business
software applications installed globally during 1998, 231 million,
or 38%, were pirated. It is a crime that can be punished with
imprisonment and a fine. Software piracy is not only a matter for
the police; it can also involve customs officers, trading standards
authorities and advertising standards authorities, as well as civil
actions for damages.
You should also consider the risks of your business using
illegally copied software. Many businesses are either unaware that
they have unlawful copies on their system or turn a blind eye to
it. Even if such a business is not caught, piracy poses other
costs. Illegally copied software may contain viruses that can wreak
havoc on a business.
You also need to watch out for illegally bundled software. Some
resellers offer a system bundled with numerous copies of popular
programs. Check that all documentation and necessary licences are
supplied with the software and that they are valid.
Bear in mind that, even if it is individual employees obtaining
and using illegal software, your business and/or its directors and
other officers can be held liable.
Guidance to employees
If you have not given formal guidance to your employees on what
software they can and cannot use, you should do so. An employee's
handbook, for example, could be used to explain to each employee,
among other matters, that he or she:-
- Must not copy any program installed on his or her computer for
any purpose without prior written permission;
- Must not install any program onto his or her computer without
prior written permission;
- That [the business] will not tolerate any employee making
unauthorised copies of software;
- That any employee found copying software illegally is subject
to disciplinary measures and even dismissal;
- If he or she wants to use software licensed by [the business]
at home, he or she must consult with [a manager] to ensure that
such use is permitted by the relevant licence.
If covering such matters in a handbook or by any other means,
make sure they are read and understood by each employee.
If you have not got one, you should consider compiling an
inventory of all software stored on all computers (and elsewhere)
and ascertain that valid licences exist for each piece of software
(and any authorised copies of it). Any unlicensed software found
should be deleted and, if appropriate, replaced with licensed
copies.
Fraud
One reason many people are reluctant to shop on-line is a fear
of credit card fraud. Many are under the impression that when they
give their details to a web site, their credit card number will be
intercepted by an internet eavesdropper. Fraud takes many different
forms with varying penalties depending on the circumstances. The
difficulty for the police is in catching those responsible.
Spoofing attacks, for example, can cause serious security
problems for some companies, yet the attack can be straightforward
and the attacker may be untraceable. Most of these attacks involve
mail spoofing, where the "from" address is falsified in one or a
series of e-mail messages, making the recipient think they are
communicating with a legitimate person or business. Another
variation is to create a dummy web site to persuade the user that
they are accessing the legitimate site ("phishing") . Although the
user enters the correct URL, the local name server has been spoofed
into believing that the domain name corresponds to the address of a
web server run by hacker. Typosquatters can also commit fraud by
taking advantage of users entering an incorrect URL. You can learn
more about typosquatting in our Branding and Intellectual Property
guide.
Internet pornography
Pursuant to the Control of Obscene and Indecent Articles
Ordinance (Cap 390), it is an offence to publish an obscene
article. Publication covers distribution, circulation, selling,
hiring, giving, or lending the obscene article. Distribution by
email would fall within the definition of distribution, as would
the placing of an obscene article on a web site. It should also be
noted that distribution does not require any element of financial
gain to be present. The definition of article includes "anything
consisting of or containing material to be read or looked at or
both read and looked at, any sound recording, and any film,
video-tape, disc or other record of a picture or pictures." The
article will be considered obscene if, by reason by its obscenity,
"it is not suitable to be published by any person." Obscenity
includes "violence, depravity and repulsiveness". The penalty for
this offence is up to three years imprisonment and a fine of up to
HK$1,000,000.
Protection of children
The Control of Obscene and Indecent Articles Ordinance (Cap 390)
makes it an offence to publish any indecent article to a person who
is a juvenile, whether or not that person knows the article is
indecent or that such person is a juvenile. The punishment for this
offence is up to 12 months imprisonment and a fine of HK$400,000 on
a first conviction and up to 12 months imprisonment and a fine of
HK$800,000 on a second or subsequent conviction.
ISPs and pornography
The liability of ISPs for pornography posted onto their servers
has yet to be addressed by the Hong Kong courts. World wide
examples have led to differing findings and it is therefore
difficult to draw any solid conclusions. In a well publicised case,
German prosecutors brought charges against the local manager of
CompuServe in connection with child pornography on the internet. On
the other hand, the American Courts have taken a more lenient view
with respect to ISP liability.
An EU Directive on Electronic Commerce provides that, generally
speaking, ISPs will have no liability for data content when they
only provide access or transmission services. Even if they take a
more active role and host a web site, they will not be liable for
the content of that web site, provided that:
- they do not know of any offending material which appears upon
that site; and
- they move swiftly to remove such material once they have
knowledge of its existence.
Generally speaking, ISPs should make it a condition that anyone
wishing to host adult or offensive material first presents a
visitor with a clearly readable warning on the nature of the
material in the site and that it is only suitable for those aged
over 18. The ISP should also reserve the right to remove any site
not complying with the conditions of use. Although the ISP will not
monitor the sites it hosts, in the event of complaint, the ISP will
be justified in removing the site if it does not comply with the
condition.
In England, a criminal case decided that someone could be guilty
of importing indecent photographs of children where he was under
the impression that he was importing pornographic material but
unaware that it was child pornography. This reasoning could be
relevant to ISPs. Knowing that a site contains illegal material
could be enough for a prosecution - knowledge of the degree of
illegality might not be necessary.
Images downloaded by employees
Downloading illegal images may well make an employee liable for
summary dismissal. This will however depend on whether dismissal is
an appropriate sanction in the particular circumstances, so it
should not be considered a general rule. No dismissal should take
place until a full and proper investigation is carried out and fair
disciplinary procedures followed. It is always advisable to seek
advice from your solicitor before dismissing.
Any employer should have an internet and e-mail policy (you can
download one here). The policy should specifically prohibit
downloading pornography and make it clear to employees that this
behaviour will not be tolerated and is likely to lead to instant
dismissal. Having such a policy not only clarifies the rules for
the employee but might also help you as the employer if there is a
question of vicarious liability.
Issues of this kind are rarely clear-cut. If you are in any
doubt over how to address a particular situation, you should always
consult your solicitor.
Data Protection
The Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (Cap 486) provides for
certain minimum standards that must be applied by a data user to
ensure the ongoing security and integrity of any personal data that
they may have. The Ordinance provides for 6 data privacy
principles, which govern the handling of personal data.
For example, data principle 4 governs the security of personal
data. This principle provides that "all practicable steps shall be
taken to ensure that personal data (including data in a form in
which access to or processing of the data is not practicable) held
by a data user are protected against unauthorised or accidental
access, processing, erasure or other use..."
The operator of a web site would therefore be under an
obligation, under this principle, to take appropriate steps to
secure against unauthorised or unlawful processing, which would
include hackers who might try to access personal information stored
on the web site. What is an appropriate level of security will vary
according to the type of information stored. For example, medical
and financial details would demand greater security than details of
interests and hobbies. The business operating the web site is also
obliged to ensure the reliability of any employees with access to
personal data.
Similar demands are placed on businesses that store personal
information in other ways, not just web sites. If personal data is
held for the purposes of marketing or as employee records, whether
manually or on a computer system, the Ordinance will also
apply.
Failure to comply with the Ordinance can lead to the serving of
an enforcement notice; failure to comply with the notice is a
criminal offence. The Ordinance provides for other offences where
misleading information is given in response to requests for access
to personal data made under the Ordinance.
Jurisdiction
One of the most important legal issues arising out of the growth
of the internet is the question of jurisdiction and the difficulty
in applying domestic laws when considering offences which have been
partially committed overseas. As yet there is no local case law on
this point.
Pornography will be met with varying levels of acceptance in
different jurisdictions. For example, it is possible that the
on-line seller of lingerie could fall foul of a strict regime such
as Saudi Arabia's. Where the web site operator and the user are
located in different countries, enforcement of national laws can be
problematic. Generally, however, national authorities will only
sanction extradition if the conduct complained of would constitute
an offence if committed on its own territory.
If your web site has particular target markets, you can make it
clear on the home page of your web site and use a disclaimer to
reduce your risk of liability. For more information, see our guide
on Jurisdiction.
Links
If you have a report to make on the sale or use of illegal
software, you should contact FAST or BSA.
Any questions? Please contact peter.bullock@out-law.com /
+852 2521 5621 or one of our other contacts.