If passed, the Control of Internet Access (Child Pornography)
Act would require every ISP to declare in its annual report and on
its website whether it is actively pursuing measures to prevent its
customers from obtaining access to known child pornography
websites. It would stop short of compelling an ISP to block
access.
It was introduced as a Private Member's Bill by Margaret Moran,
Labour MP for Luton South, last October. She told the House of
Commons at the time: "Let us not be under any illusion. The
situation surrounding internet child pornography is appalling."
She cited estimates from the National Society for the Prevention
of Cruelty to Children, suggesting that 20,000 new images of child
pornography go online every week.
Moran pointed to the Cleanfeed filtering system introduced by BT
in [2004]. It prevents BT's customers accessing a blacklist of
illegal websites, collated by the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF).
"I commend those ISPs that have used the available technology to
block such sites," said Moran. "AOL, BT, Yahoo! and Vodafone are
models of good corporate citizenship."
But she said too many ISPs do very little to block child
pornography sites. Hence the bill.
"The Bill is intended primarily as a public accountability
mechanism," she said. The declaration in the annual report would
come alongside others that are already required – such as
declarations on carbon emissions or health and safety.
"The public, parents and policy makers are all entitled to know
who is trying to kill off the trade in illegal child abuse images
and who is not," she added.
These comments were made on 26th October 2005. The bill's second
reading was on 12th May. Private Member's Bills rarely go further.
However, on 15th May, the Home Office Parliamentary Under-Secretary
Vernon Coaker suggested that if ISPs do not voluntarily block child
porn by the end of next year, the Government will consider taking
further action.
Coaker was answering a written question from Sian James, Labour
MP for Swansea East, on what progress has been made by the
Government with ISPs in preventing access to child porn.
Coaker pointed to a reduction in the proportion of illegal sites
reported to the IWF that are hosted in the UK, from 18% in 1997 to
0.4% in 2005.
And of blacklisting by providers, Coaker said that all 3G mobile
network operators currently block their mobile customers from
accessing known illegal sites and the biggest ISPs (who between
them provide over 90% of domestic broadband connections) are either
currently blocking or have plans to by the end of 2006.
"We recognise the progress that has been made as a result of the
industry's commitment and investment so far," said Coaker.
"However, 90% of connections is not enough and we are setting a
target that by the end of 2007, all ISPs offering broadband
internet connectivity to the UK general public put in place
technical measures that prevent their customers accessing websites
containing illegal images of child abuse identified by the
IWF."
He said that for new ISPs or services, "we would expect them to
put in place measures within nine months of offering the service to
the public."
He added, "If it appears that we are not going to meet our
target through co-operation, we will review the options for
stopping UK residents accessing websites on the IWF list."
Disclaimer: We hope you find OUT-LAW’s content useful. It’s prepared by the lawyers at Pinsent Masons. Please remember, though, that it’s intended as general information only. It’s not legal advice. If that’s what you’re seeking, please
contact us. See also: our
full disclaimer
