The regulator has published a consultation paper on its plan.
The change would mean that shareholders alone would meet the cost
of a company's management failures.
A with-profits fund is made up of policyholder premiums,
investment returns and shareholder contributions. The part of the
fund that exceeds the firm's realistic liabilities to policyholders
is known as the "inherited estate".
The inherited estate is an asset of the life company and can be
used to provide working capital, smooth out returns between good
and bad years and fund future growth.
Under current FSA rules, however, the inherited estate can also
be used to fund compensation payments to victims of mis-selling. In
recent years, these have included significant pay-outs to meet
pension and mortgage endowment claims.
The rule has been criticised for not treating with-profits
policyholders fairly because such payments reduce the amount that
might otherwise be paid to them on a distribution or
reattribution.
At least once a year, a life company operating a with-profits
fund must consider whether to distribute any excess surplus. If
retention cannot be justified, the excess should be distributed to
policyholders and shareholders, usually on a ratio of 90:10.
In recent years, there has been a tendency for more with-profits
funds to be closed to new business. In such circumstances, a
distribution to policyholders becomes increasingly likely as the
need for working capital recedes.
Alternatively, a life company may decide to negotiate with its
policyholders to give up their rights in the inherited estate in
return for payment (known as a reattribution).
In either case, the amount payable to policyholders can be
significantly affected if the inherited estate has been used to
meet the company's liabilities for mis-selling.
The FSA now proposes to amend its Conduct of Business Rules to
state simply that a shareholder-owned company must not pay
compensation or redress from a with-profits fund.
The change would not affect mutually-owned life insurers, who would
still be able to use inherited estates to meet compensation
costs.
In addition, mortgage endowment "guarantee" schemes, which
promise a maturity value sufficient to cover the loan if investment
growth achieves a set level, would not be counted as compensation
and so would still be payable from the inherited estate.
The proposed changes would take effect for payments after 1st
November 2008, regardless of when the mis-selling occurred, and
would apply to all types of compensation, whatever the cause. Where
a court-approved scheme for payment is already in place, however,
that scheme will take precedence.
The deadline for responses to the consultation is 3rd September
2008. The FSA will publish a policy statement and its final rules
before the end of the year.
In February this year, a Parliamentary committee launched an
inquiry into the use of inherited estates, the results of which are
not yet known. The investigation has a much broader remit than the
FSA's current consultation and will cover such issues as
reattribution and the appropriate division of funds between
policyholders and shareholders.
Want more content like this? This story was written by the insurance and reinsurance legal experts at Pinsent Masons, the law firm behind OUT-LAW.COM. We've recently launched a new section, legal info for Insurance and Reinsurance, giving free legal information to anyone working in that sector.
