Webtrends Tracking Code
 
UK Home >  OUT-LAW News >  News Archive >  2000 >  September 2000 >  US arbitration decision on web sites and franchising

US arbitration decision on web sites and franchising

OUT-LAW News, 07/09/2000

In what is believed to be the first decision addressing the issue of whether franchisors may compete with their franchisees in e-commerce, a panel of arbitrators has prohibited franchisor Drug Emporium and its subsidiary, DrugEmporium.com, from selling over the internet to customers located in the territories in which franchisees have been given the exclusive right to operate Drug Emporium stores.

In deciding that a preliminary injunction should be issued, the arbitrators said the question was "whether a virtual drug store is a drug store for purposes of a franchise agreement."

In finding that the franchisees demonstrated the requisite likelihood of ultimately proving that Drug Emporium's internet sales breached its commitment to provide its franchisees the exclusive right to conduct the business of drug stores in designated territories, the arbitrators said:

"[the web site was marketed] as 'the full service on-line drugstore'... The parties' reasonable expectation was that the [franchisees] would not be forced to compete with direct drug store sales by [the franchisors]. This inference is bolstered by the failure of the franchise agreements to permit the [franchisors] to operate drug stores within the territory [reserved for the franchisees, except in the case of] a breach by the franchisees.”

The arbitrators also found that the franchisees' proof as to how Drug Emporium has been operating its web site, including advertising this new web site as “Your neighbourhood pharmacy for twenty years,” establishes a likelihood that the franchisees will ultimately prevail in proving dilution of the licenses the franchisees hold to use the Drug Emporium trademark in their territories.

Michael Dady, the Minneapolis lawyer for the franchisees, observed:

“When franchisees are given exclusive territories to conduct their store operations, and pay substantial royalties to obtain support from their franchisors, they do not expect to have to compete with their franchisors. This decision enforces the reasonable expectation of our franchisee clients - no competition from their franchisor."

Rick Asbill, immediate former chair of the American Bar Association Forum on Franchising, observed: "Internet encroachment is one of the most important issues facing franchisors, franchisees and their lawyers. This decision underlines the importance of addressing and resolving the legal issues related to internet marketing before a marketing program is implemented."

The order requires Drug Emporium and DrugEmporium.com to cease selling in the franchisees' territories (representing 29 different markets in the states of Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas and Kansas), to advise prospective purchasers within the franchisees' territories that DrugEmporium.com is unable to ship orders within those territories, and to direct all such customers to the nearest Drug Emporium franchise outlet.

 

 

OUT-LAW Recommends

Free OUT-LAW seminars
- Making your contract work
- Information security
Six cities, October & November

This week's podcast
Are ISPs about to betray our trust?

Winner at 2008 Webby Awards

OUT-LAW star: link to the home page
Disclaimer: This was printed from OUT-LAW.COM, a service of international law firm Pinsent Masons. We hope you find this content useful. However, please note that nothing in this document constitutes specific legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. Any questions, please email info@out-law.com.