OUT-LAW is exploring the case for a law that would force companies to license interface information on commercially-reasonable terms to allow interoperability.
This is not a plan to replace competition laws, which focus on a company that abuses a dominant position. This is not replacing reverse-engineering rights, which are qualified – and reverse-engineering can be an inexact science. This is not a challenge to patentability, either. If you develop an interface that's eligible for a patent, go ahead – but license it to others on reasonable commercial terms.
We want your view.
What do you think of this statement: It should be possible to force companies to license interface information on commercially-reasonable terms to allow interoperability.
<--%>--%>%--> Form builder plug-in Form: interoperability
*If you prefer, you can email your comments to our editor: [email protected].
For avoidance of doubt, this statement does not reflect the view of Pinsent Masons. We are simply doing some research.