Cookies on Pinsent Masons website

Our website uses cookies and similar technologies to allow us to promote our services and enhance your browsing experience. If you continue to use our website you agree to our use of cookies.

To understand more about how we use cookies, or for information on how to change your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.

Should interoperability become a legal right?

IBM, Microsoft and Apple have each been accused of withholding interface information. Over the years, antitrust complaints were made against all three. But do we need a new approach? Do we need an intellectual property law to assist interoperability?12 Sep 2006

OUT-LAW is exploring the case for a law that would force companies to license interface information on commercially-reasonable terms to allow interoperability.

This is not a plan to replace competition laws, which focus on a company that abuses a dominant position. This is not replacing reverse-engineering rights, which are qualified – and reverse-engineering can be an inexact science. This is not a challenge to patentability, either. If you develop an interface that's eligible for a patent, go ahead – but license it to others on reasonable commercial terms.

We want your view.

  • You might be a software firm that was refused interface information by another company. You might have designed an innovative interface and feel it is your right to keep rivals out.
  • You might be an iTunes user who wants to play purchased music on a Walkman; or you might feel that Apple has every right to keep downloads exclusive to iPods.

What do you think of this statement: It should be possible to force companies to license interface information on commercially-reasonable terms to allow interoperability.

Form builder plug-in
Form: interoperability
<--%>]]>

*If you prefer, you can email your comments to our editor: struan.robertson@out-law.com.

For avoidance of doubt, this statement does not reflect the view of Pinsent Masons. We are simply doing some research.